![]() Typical experiments in multitasking research often focus on tasks involving a rather restricted range of effector systems (mostly manual key presses see, e.g., Pashler, 1994). ![]() Taken together, effector system pairings appear to have a more substantial impact on capacity allocation policies in dual-task control than input–output modality combinations. This suggests that input–output modality mappings can (to some extent) attenuate, but not abolish/reverse effector-based prioritization. We observed vocal-over-manual prioritization in both stimulus modality conditions. ![]() To resolve this issue, we conducted a manual–vocal dual task study using either only auditory or only visual stimuli for both responses. Given that previous research on input–output modality compatibility in dual tasks suggested that pairing auditory input with vocal output represents a particularly advantageous mapping, the question arises whether the observed vocal-over-manual prioritization was merely a consequence of auditory stimulation. ![]() However, this previous study only involved auditory stimulation (for both actions). A previous study (Huestegge & Koch, 2013) demonstrated that the particular effector systems associated with the two actions can determine the pattern of processing priorities: Vocal responses were prioritized over manual responses, as indicated by smaller performance costs (associated with dual-action demands) for the former. Such decrements are often distributed asymmetrically between the two actions involved, reflecting different processing priorities. one in isolation) usually yields performance costs. I used to own Naim kit, and from them I always received prompt and friendly answers, even if I asked them for spare parts for IBL's or a faulty input selector for a Nac 62.Īny advice on how to get to EAR Yoshino's "new box dept." would be greatly appreciated.Abstract. I expect to take delivery of an EAR 912 later this month and I must admit that I had hoped for better communiction from them. ![]() I have spent well over 5000£ on two EAR 868's - although they won't know that unless they actually read the emails that I sent to them. (2) Last week I contacted EAR to ask them for a new box and a manual for an EAR 868PL to be sent to the new owner in the UK. (1) I sent an email some time earlier this year about the cost of upgrading an EAR 868L to PL status (adding the phono stage) - neither I nor the Danish importer ever heard anything back. I have now tried twice to contact EAR Yoshino to get their help with quearies related to one of their products that I own / have owned. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |